Measures
The Measurement of Sexual Attitudes and
Sexuality Standards.
What are some of the measurement issues associated with measuring
sexual attitudes and sexuality standards?
What measures were used in these studies?
- Relationship Requirements Rating Scale
(RRRS).
A face valid item was adapted from Hunt (1974) and Delamater and
MacCorquodale (1979) to assess relationship requirements prior
to vaginal intercourse in a forced choice format.
-
Modified Sexuality Standards Scale (MSSS).
Five items were written to assess participants acceptance
of sexual intercourse for themselves as a function of the relationship.
Responses were obtained on a 9 point scale with the endpoints
anchored with "Very Acceptable for Me" and "Very
Unacceptable for Me". The general format was the same as
the typical sexuality standard scale, however the target person
references was "self". In order to summate these five
items into a Modified Sexuality Standards Scale score, principle
components factor analysis was used to make sure the items formed
a unidimensional scale. This resulted in one factor that accounted
for 66% of the variability of the individual items. The first
item was reverse coded and the items were summated to form the
MSSS. Higher scores on the MSSS indicate more sexual permissiveness.
The MSSS has an internal consistency reliability of .87 which
is more than adequate. Scores on the MSSS were normally distributed
and ranged from 5 to 35 (mean = 17.57, sd = 8.3). To facilitate
interpretation of the individual MSSS items for examining specific
beliefs, 5 was subtracted from each response which resulted in
scoring that ranged from -4 (Very Unacceptable for Self) to +4
(Very Acceptable for Self).
-
Sexual Opinion Survey. The Sexual Opinion Survey
was scored according to instructions from Fisher, Byrne, and White
(1983). Higher scores indicate more positive affect toward sexuality
(Erotophilia)--lower scores mean more negative affective reactions
toward sexuality (Erotophobia).
| Sample | Alpha | Range | Mean |
sd |
| Oklahoma | .72 | 9 - 111 |
65.09 | 21.68 |
| Texas | .80 | 3 - 107 |
53.72 | 21.88 |
- Sexual Behavior Measures. Several measures of sexual
behavior were available:
- Age of onset of sexual intercourse (OK sample)
- Number of different sexual partners in the last year (OK &
TX samples)
- Number of one night stands (TX sample)
-
Q-sort Data, Oklahoma Sample. Three vignettes
were written to illustrate males and females in relationships
that reflected typical examples of Abstinence, Permissiveness
with Affection, and Permissiveness without Affection. The description
of love was drawn from Lamanna and Riedman (1985).
-
Q-Sort Data, Texas Sample. Ten vignettes
were written to represent points on Reiss's premarital sexuality
standards continuum. Each vignette contained a description of
the couple having much in common on their first date. Additional
information was added to each vignette to illustrate the core
beliefs of each sexuality standard. The first vignette consisted
of a couple who were engaged but had decided not to have sex until
after they were married. The second vignette consisted of a couple
who were now engaged and had had sex. The third vignette consisted
of a couple who were now in love and had engaged in sex with each
other. The fourth vignette consisted of a couple who liked each
other and who had sex. The fifth vignette consisted of a couple
who had sex on their first date.
Back to Sexuality Standards